Analysis & Commentary · Governance pillar

UK SRS board oversight: the governance pillar

The first pillar of UK SRS is governance, and it asks a deceptively simple question — who, on this board, actually owns climate?

UK SRS S2 paragraphs 5 to 7 turn that question into a set of specific disclosures about oversight, skills, decision-making, targets and pay.

This page is practical guidance for boards and audit committees preparing to answer it.

Updated 16 June 2026 · Independent analysis · SRS Report
Paras 5–7
UK SRS S2 governance disclosure requirements
UK SRS S2 [1]
25 Feb 2026
UK SRS S1 and S2 published; voluntary use
DBT [1]
1 Jan 2027
Proposed mandatory UK SRS S2 reporting
FCA CP26/5 [3]
s.172(1)(d)
Directors’ duty: environment and community
Companies Act 2006 [4]
Start here

Why governance comes first

UK SRS keeps the four-pillar architecture inherited from the TCFD: governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets.

Governance comes first for a reason.

The objective of the governance disclosures in UK SRS S2 is to let investors understand the processes, controls and procedures a company uses to monitor, manage and oversee climate-related risks and opportunities[1].

In plain terms, the standard asks the board to show its working: not that climate appears on an agenda, but that there is a clear owner, a real mandate, the right skills, and a line of sight from the boardroom to the company’s climate response[1].

UK SRS S1 applies the same governance lens to every material sustainability topic, not only climate, so the discipline a board builds for S2 carries straight across to the wider framework[1].

Our read: the governance pillar is the cheapest pillar to get wrong and the most expensive to retrofit. Targets and emissions can be measured later; oversight arrangements have to be in place, minuted and evidenced before the first mandatory report, which the FCA has proposed for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027[3].
The requirement

What UK SRS S2 paragraphs 5 to 7 actually ask

The governance disclosures break down into a checklist a board can work through directly.

Each item below maps to a specific element of the requirement, and each is something an audit committee can test against its own papers.

The governance disclosure checklist (UK SRS S2 paragraphs 5–7)
Disclosure elementWhat the board must showBoard evidence to point to
Body or individual responsibleIdentify the board, committee or named individual that oversees climate-related risks and opportunitiesBoard / committee structure; designated non-executive director where used
Terms of referenceHow that oversight responsibility is reflected in terms of reference, mandates, role descriptions and related policiesCommittee terms of reference; board policy
Skills and competenciesHow the body ensures the appropriate skills and competencies are available or will be developedSkills matrix; board training and induction log
How and how often informedHow, and how often, the body is informed about climate-related risks and opportunitiesBoard calendar; reporting cadence and pack contents
Major decisions and riskHow the body considers climate in overseeing strategy, major transactions, and risk management processesInvestment / risk-appetite papers; minuted decisions
Oversight of targetsHow the body sets and oversees targets and monitors progress against themTarget-setting minutes; progress reporting
Remuneration linkageWhether and how climate-related considerations are factored into executive remunerationRemuneration committee report; pay policy
Management’s roleHow management’s role is delegated and how oversight is exercised over that roleDelegated authorities; management committee remit

Paragraph 7 adds an important relief: where oversight of sustainability is managed on an integrated basis, a company may provide integrated governance disclosures rather than repeating the same information separately for each risk and opportunity, which avoids unnecessary duplication[1].

For the full picture of how the pillar fits alongside strategy, risk and metrics, see our UK SRS S2 climate disclosures analysis and the broader UK SRS requirements guide.

Accountability

Who owns climate on your board?

The first disclosure is the hardest conversation: naming where accountability sits. UK SRS S2 requires you to identify the body or individual responsible for oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities[1].

That can be the full board, a committee, or a named individual — the standard does not impose a single structure, but it does require you to be specific and to evidence the choice in terms of reference[1].

UK board practice is reflected in one of the six UK-specific amendments to the standard, which references a designated non-executive director within the governance disclosures[2].

Whatever structure you choose, the board cannot simply delegate and forget: the standard also asks how management’s role is exercised and how the board oversees it, so accountability has to run both ways[1].

The legal anchor

How this connects to section 172

Board oversight of climate does not begin with UK SRS.

It already sits inside directors’ existing duties.

Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 requires directors to promote the success of the company while having regard to a list of factors, including the impact of the company’s operations on the community and the environment at section 172(1)(d)[4].

Where climate-related risks and opportunities bear on the long-term success of the company, they fall squarely within that duty, and the UK SRS governance disclosures make the board’s response visible to investors[1].

The reporting home is the Strategic Report: section 414CB(2A) of the Companies Act 2006 enables a national framework to be designated for climate-related financial disclosure, which is how UK SRS connects to the existing reporting architecture[5].

In short, section 172 sets the duty and UK SRS makes the board’s discharge of it transparent.

The two are complementary, not alternatives.

The lens

Oversight through the enterprise-value lens

UK SRS uses an enterprise-value, investor-focused materiality test, not the double-materiality approach used by the EU’s CSRD[1].

For the board, that frames what oversight is for. The governance disclosures are about the climate-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect the company’s prospects — its cash flows, access to finance and cost of capital[1].

That focus helps an audit committee prioritise: oversight effort should track the matters that are financially material to the business, and the governance disclosures should make that prioritisation legible to investors[1].

Pay and targets

Targets, remuneration and the audit committee

Two of the governance disclosures put real pressure on board sub-committees: oversight of targets, and remuneration.

On remuneration, UK SRS S2 requires a company to describe whether and how climate-related considerations are factored into executive remuneration, and to disclose the percentage of executive management remuneration recognised in the current period that is linked to climate-related considerations[1].

This is a transparency requirement, not a mandate to link pay to climate. A company that does not use climate metrics in remuneration states that — but it must address the question rather than stay silent[1].

On targets, the board must show how it oversees the targets the company sets and monitors progress against them, which ties the governance pillar directly to the metrics and targets pillar[1].

Practical step: the remuneration and audit committees should agree, before the first report, who answers the remuneration-linkage question and on what evidence — the disclosure draws their work into the governance narrative whether or not pay is currently tied to climate[1].
Getting ready

A board readiness checklist

With the FCA proposing mandatory UK SRS S2 reporting for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, boards of in-scope companies have limited runway to embed credible oversight arrangements[3].

The practical work splits into a handful of moves a chair and company secretary can sequence now.

Name the owner. Decide whether the board, a committee or a named director holds oversight, and write it into the relevant terms of reference rather than leaving it implied[1].

Close the skills gap. Map current board climate competencies against what the oversight role needs, and schedule training or recruitment to fill the gap[1].

Fix the cadence. Set how and how often the board is briefed on climate, and make sure the board pack actually carries that information[1].

Wire climate into decisions. Ensure major-transaction and risk papers surface climate where it is material, so the minutes evidence consideration rather than assertion[1].

For the wider sequencing, our UK SRS implementation guide and the UK SRS and FCA framework set out who is in scope and from when. The deadline tracker collects every key date.

Common questions

Board oversight under UK SRS: frequently asked questions

What does the UK SRS governance pillar require boards to disclose?

Under UK SRS S2 paragraphs 5 to 7, an entity must disclose the governance processes, controls and procedures it uses to monitor, manage and oversee climate-related risks and opportunities. In practice this means identifying the body or individual responsible for oversight, explaining how that responsibility is reflected in terms of reference and role descriptions, how the board ensures the right skills and competencies, how and how often it is informed, how it factors climate into major decisions and risk management, how it oversees targets, and whether and how climate considerations feature in executive remuneration. UK SRS S1 applies the same governance lens to every material sustainability topic, not just climate.

Does UK SRS require a named director to be responsible for climate?

UK SRS S2 requires you to identify the body or individual responsible for oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities — that can be the full board, a committee such as the audit committee, or a named individual. One of the six UK-specific amendments to the standard refers to a designated non-executive director role in the governance disclosures, reflecting UK board practice. The standard does not force a particular structure, but it does require you to be specific about where accountability sits and to back that up with terms of reference rather than a general statement that climate is on the agenda.

How does board oversight connect to section 172 of the Companies Act 2006?

Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 requires directors to promote the success of the company while having regard to a list of factors, including, at section 172(1)(d), the impact of the company’s operations on the community and the environment. Climate-related risks and opportunities are increasingly part of that duty where they bear on the long-term success of the company. The UK SRS governance disclosures give investors visible evidence of how directors are discharging that duty in respect of climate, so the two reinforce each other: section 172 sets the duty and UK SRS makes the board’s response to it transparent.

When does board oversight under UK SRS become mandatory?

UK SRS S1 and S2 were published by the Department for Business and Trade on 25 February 2026 and are currently available for voluntary use. The Financial Conduct Authority, in consultation paper CP26/5, proposed making UK SRS S2 mandatory for in-scope listed companies for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027. CP26/5 closed on 20 March 2026 and the FCA is expected to confirm final rules in a Policy Statement in autumn 2026. Boards of in-scope companies should treat the governance pillar as a near-term priority because oversight arrangements take time to embed before the first mandatory report.

How does climate feature in executive remuneration under UK SRS?

UK SRS S2 requires an entity to describe whether and how climate-related considerations are factored into executive remuneration, and to disclose the percentage of executive management remuneration recognised in the current period that is linked to climate-related considerations. This sits within the governance pillar and connects to the standard’s requirements on target oversight. The disclosure is about transparency, not a mandate to link pay to climate: a company that does not use climate metrics in remuneration simply states that, but it must address the question rather than stay silent.

Is the governance pillar the same in UK SRS S1 and UK SRS S2?

They share the same architecture. UK SRS S1 sets out the general governance disclosure requirements for sustainability-related risks and opportunities across all material topics, and UK SRS S2 applies that same governance lens specifically to climate. Where oversight of sustainability is managed on an integrated basis, the standards allow an entity to provide integrated governance disclosures rather than repeating the same information for each topic, which avoids unnecessary duplication. In effect, S1 is the framework and S2 is its first, climate-specific application.

UK SRS Board Oversight — the governance pillar for directors and audit committees
UK SRS Board Oversight · SRS Report
Related analysis
UK SRS S2 climate disclosuresThe four pillars in full — governance, strategy, risk management and metrics and targets.UK SRS requirementsWhat the standards actually require, from materiality to GHG emissions and assurance.UK SRS implementation guideHow to sequence readiness work from board oversight through to first report.
Sources & primary references
  1. UK SRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures (governance, paragraphs 5–7; remuneration, paragraph 29(g)) GOV.UK / Department for Business and Trade · Final standards published 25 February 2026; available for voluntary use
  2. UK Sustainability Reporting Standards (guidance) GOV.UK / Department for Business and Trade · Government overview, six UK-specific amendments and next steps
  3. CP26/5: Aligning listed issuers’ sustainability disclosures with international standards Financial Conduct Authority · Proposed mandatory UK SRS S2 from 1 Jan 2027; closed 20 Mar 2026; Policy Statement expected autumn 2026
  4. Companies Act 2006, section 172 — duty to promote the success of the company legislation.gov.uk · Section 172(1)(d): impact of operations on the community and the environment
  5. Companies Act 2006, section 414CB — climate-related financial disclosure legislation.gov.uk · Section 414CB(2A) enables a national framework to be designated within the Strategic Report